Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Part 2
α-Adrenergic blockers
It has been suggested that the dynamic component of obstruction, smooth muscle tone in bladder heck, prostate, urethra, and prostatic capsule, is responsible for the variation in symptoms. Prostatic smooth muscle tone is regulated by the autonomic nervous system. The contractile response of prostatic tissue to norepinephrine and its abolishment by pretreatment with OC-adrenergic antagonists was first demonstrated by Gaine and colleagues during the 1970s. α1 and α2-receptors have recently been identified in human prostate and bladder neck by radioligand receptor studies. Contractile response is predominantly mediated by α1-receptors.
Well-controlled studies have been performed demonstrating the efficacy of phe-noxybenzamine (non-selective α-adrenergic antagonist), prazosin (α1-adrenergic antagonist), and terazosin (α1-adrenergic antagonist) in the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Meaningful improvements in symptom score, global assessment, and urodynamic parameters (peak flow rate, mean flow rate) have been documented with these agents. Side effects have been minimal, and hypotension was not a problem.
α -Adrenergic blockade can be expected to provide a degree of relief from outlet obstruction. Once long-term experience with these agents has been gained, their role in the management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia can be clarified.
Anticholinergic agents
A literature review of the medical management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia is remarkable for the fact that the anticholinergic agents are virtually ignored. Approximately 75% of patients with BPH have significant irritative symptoms, such as frequency, urgency, and nocturia, which are considered to be due to detrusor hypertrophy. In many of these patients, the obstructive symptoms (Table 3) are minor and of little concern. The efficacy of such medications as oxybutynin (Ditropan) in the treatment of unstable bladders is clear. It could be that these medications are not used more often for fear of causing urinary retention.
|
Table 3. Obstructive Voiding Symptoms |
|
• Hesitancy |
|
• Intermittency |
|
• Terminal dribbling |
|
• Impairment of size and force of urinary stream |
|
• Sensation of incomplete emptying |
Of the 75% of patients with irritative symptoms, 33% will have persistent symptoms after relief of outlet obstruction. It is useful to know whether these symptoms can be medically controlled. If they cannot, then the patient may have little benefit, symptomatically, from a transurethral prostatic resection (TUPR) and should be aware of this before the operation.
There are many causes for irritative voiding symptoms. The physician should rule out infection. If gross or microscopic hematuria is present, then bladder cancer must be ruled out. If the patient is adequately emptying his bladder, as determined by palpation, ultrasound, or postvoid catheterization, then a trial of anticholinergic medication, such as oxybutynin, 2.5 mg by mouth, is worthwhile. A significant number of patients benefit substantially; moreover the drug can occasionally be tapered and discontinued after 3 to 6 months without a return of symptoms. If outlet obstruction worsens, then one can proceed to prostatectomy, secure in the knowledge that any persisting irritative symptoms can be controlled after surgery.
