Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia – Prostate Cancer – Prostatitis

Archive for the ‘Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia’ Category

Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

No Comments

The National Prescribing Centre (NPC) [UK]

Summary

Symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in older men. They result from hyperplasia of glandular tissue and increased smooth muscle tone. Many men accept these symptoms as a normal part of the ageing process, and do not seek treatment.

As BPH is not always a progressive condition, and the incidence of complications is low, ‘watchful waiting’ is appropriate for men whose symptoms are mild.

Men suffering severe symptoms, or who develop complications of benign prostatic hyperplasia such as acute urinary retention or recurrent urinary tract infection, should be referred to a urologist for consideration of surgical treatment.

Transurethral resection of the prostate is the most commonly used surgical procedure. It is more effective than drug therapy, but is occasionally associated with complications such as impotence and incontinence.

Alphaj-adrenoceptor blocking drugs reduce smooth muscle tone in the prostatic tissue and bladder neck, decreasing resistance to urinary flow. They can produce cardiovascular side-effects, such as hypotension.

Tamsulosin (Flomax MR, capsules, 400 micrograms) is an inhibitor of the α1A-receptor subtype, which is thought to be predominant in the prostate. No convincing evidence exists that this results in fewer adverse effects compared to other α1-blockers.

Finasteride (Proscar, tablets, 5mg) inhibits 5α-reductase, resulting in shrinkage of prostatic glandular tissue. There is evidence that finasteride also reduces the risk of acute urinary retention and need for surgery, although such events are relatively uncommon.

Patients should be informed of the advantages and disadvantages of all treatment options, and should participate in the choice of therapy.

What is benign prostatic hyperplasia?

BPH is a benign enlargement of the prostate gland which occurs as a consequence of ageing. This leads to narrowing of the urethra, which may result in difficulty in passing urine. Prostatic enlargement is believed to be the result of two processes:

• hyperplasia of glandular tissue, under the stimulus of dihydrotestosterone (DHT); and

• increased smooth muscle tone, both within the prostate and in the bladder neck, under the control of α1-adrenoceptors.

Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia aims to alter these processes, either by inhibiting 5α-reductase, the enzyme responsible for the formation of DHT, or by blockade of α1-adrenoceptors.

Patients suffering from BPH may present with a variety of the following symptoms, which may be classified as:

‘filling’ symptoms: such as frequency, urgency, and nocturia; or

‘voiding’ symptoms: e.g. poor urinary stream, intermittent stream, hesitancy and terminal dribbling.

Symptoms from either or both categories may occur. While they may be irritating, these symptoms do not in themselves have serious consequences. However, on some occasions, bladder outflow obstruction resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia may lead to recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and pyelonephritis, or chronic urinary retention and hydronephrosis.

How common is it?

Symptoms of BPH may be found in a large number of men over the age of 60, and the prevalence rises with age. There is a lack of consensus on an exact definition for the condition; differences in criteria for the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia have led to varying estimates of prevalence in studies.

One study determined the prevalence rates of BPH in a population of 502 men aged 55 to 74 using several different case definitions. Prevalence rates in men aged 60-64 varied from 2% to 22%, depending on the parameters used. In this study, the prostate volume used as the main cut-off for diagnosis of BPH was 30cm. However, in a study using a prostate weight of 20g as the cut-off, prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men aged 60-69 was 43%.

Added to this uncertainty is the fact that many men who admit to suffering symptoms of BPH when questioned, say their symptoms are not particularly bothersome. Many men accept symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia as a normal part of the ageing process, and may not be prompted to seek treatment.

What are the treatment options?

Treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia range from no active treatment (’watchful waiting’), through various medical interventions, to surgical treatment. Each option is associated with a different balance of risks, benefits, and level of uncertainty about the long-term outcome. Treatment of BPH is directed at improving patients’ symptoms and quality of life rather than towards prevention of the serious morbidity or mortality which may rarely result. For these reasons, it is essential that patients are actively involved in the decision on which treatment they receive.

Non-drug treatment

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is not always a progressive condition. A review article summarising the results of five studies of the natural history of BPH, concluded that, of men with moderate symptoms followed for five years, 40% would improve, 45% remain unchanged and only about 15% deteriorate. One study randomly assigned 556 men with moderate symptoms of BPH to transurethral surgery or watchful waiting and followed them for almost three years. It found that only 7% of those assigned to the watchful waiting group required surgery for ‘treatment failure’. Watchful waiting is, therefore, considered a valid treatment option for men with mild to moderate symptoms.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered to be the gold standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. It produces significant improvements for many men in symptoms and in objective measures, such as peak urinary flow rate. Complications which have been attributed to TURP include retrograde ejaculation, impotence, and some degree of urinary incontinence. However, the study mentioned above found no difference in rates of incontinence or impotence between men assigned to transurethral resection of the prostate and those assigned to watchful waiting.

Drug treatment

Alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking drugs act by reducing smooth muscle tone in the prostatic tissue and bladder neck, thereby decreasing resistance to urinary flow. Six agents are available in the UK; these are alfuzosin (Xatral, tablets, 2.5mg; Xatral SR, tablets, 5mg), doxazosin (Cardura, tablets, 2mg/4mg), indoramin (Doralese, tablets, 20mg), prazosin (Hypovase, tablets, 2mg; Prazosin, tablets, 2mg), tamsulosin (Flomax MR, capsules) and terazosin (Hytrin BPH, tablets, 5mg/10mg).

A review of twenty-nine clinical trials of α1-blockers stated that the average improvement in maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) with these compounds was 1.5ml/s. Overall symptom scores decreased by 14% and residual urine volume decreased by 29%. Some tolerance to the effects on urinary flow rate was noted in a proportion of patients after six months of therapy. However, the improvement in symptom scores was maintained long-term.

Side-effects associated with the α1-blockers include hypotension, particularly after the first dose, sedation, and dizziness. Therapy is usually begun with a low dose taken at bedtime and titrated upwards over a few weeks.

Tamsulosin is an agent which is more selective than other alpha1-blockers; it is said to act on the α1A-receptor subtype, which is thought to be predominant in prostatic tissue. Theoretically, such a selective action might avoid some of the cardiovascular effects seen with other agents.

Tamsulosin has been compared to alfuzosin and terazosin in clinical trials. When compared to alfuzosin in 245 men with benign prostatic enlargement and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia, tamsulosin produced comparable improvements in O and symptom scores over twelve weeks. Although tamsulosin had significantly less effect on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure than alfuzosin, no difference in the rate of adverse events associated with the hypotensive effects of α1-blockers was observed.

In the second study, which was single-blind, involved 72 patients and lasted for nine weeks, tamsulosin and terazosin were similarly effective in improving both subjective and objective measures of BPH. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular effects was higher in the terazosin group. It is difficult to assess how relevant the results of this study are to the UK, as it was conducted in Korea and the dose of tamsulosin was much lower than that used here.

Finasteride is a specific inhibitor of the enzyme 5a-reductase, which is responsible for the metabolism of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, a more potent androgen. DHT stimulates prostatic growth and the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Treatment with 5mg finasteride for twelve months has been shown to reduce prostate volume by 19%, increase maximum urinary flow rate by 1.6ml/s, and decrease total urinary-symptom scores by 21%.

Two recent studies investigated the effects of finasteride on the incidence of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment. The first study was a pooled analysis of three randomised, double-blind, multicentre studies comparing finasteride 5mg daily to placebo over 24 months in 4,222 patients with moderate symptoms of BPH. Finasteride therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in both acute urinary retention and rates of surgical intervention.

The second study compared 5mg of finasteride to placebo over four years in a randomised, double-blind trial. A total of 3,040 men with enlarged prostates and moderate to severe urinary symptoms were recruited from 95 centres. The primary end-point of the study was the symptom score; need for prostate surgery and development of acute urinary retention were secondary end-points.

Symptom scores decreased by a mean of 3.3 points out of 35 (9.4%) in the finasteride group, compared to a mean of 1.3 points (3.7%) in the placebo group. The risks of surgery and acute urinary retention (AUR) were both significantly reduced by finasteride. However, the absolute reduction in the risk of surgery or AUR was only 6.6%, meaning that 15 men would have to be treated with finasteride for four years in order to avoid one episode of acute urinary retention or surgery.

A recent meta-analysis of six trials comparing finasteride with placebo examined whether there was any relationship between measures of disease severity at the start of treatment and the response to finasteride. It concluded that improvements in peak urinary flow rate and symptom scores were significant only in men whose prostate volume was measured (by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging) at greater than 40cm3.

Adverse effects associated with finasteride include decreased libido, decreased ejaculate volume and impotence. Finasteride reduces serum concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA), a marker for prostate cancer, by an average of 50%.

Finasteride was compared to terazosin, combination therapy, and placebo in 1,229 men in a double-blind study lasting 52 weeks. This study found that terazosin was significantly more effective than finasteride and placebo in improving symptom scores and urinary flow rate. It also found that the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin monotherapy, even though finasteride reduced prostate size. Finasteride alone was not significantly different to placebo.

This study has been criticised on the basis of its inclusion criteria, which were based on symptoms rather than prostate size. The average prostate volume in the study population was only 37cm. An accompanying editorial suggested that men with larger prostates might respond differently to finasteride.

How should patients be managed?

The following investigations are recommended before any course of action is decided:

• full medical history,

• urinary symptom review,

• digital rectal examination (DRE),

• urine analysis, and

• serum creatinine.

Routine measurement of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is controversial. This is due to uncertainty over whether moderately raised levels are indicative of benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer. GPs should discuss policies on the use of PSA levels with local urology departments.

Symptom severity is not directly related to prostate size. Use of a validated symptom score, such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), can help to categorise the severity of BPH, and monitor response to therapy.

Referral to a urologist for further investigations (such as ultrasound and urinary flow rate studies) and management may be considered for patients with moderate to severe symptoms, as well as those with complications such as haematuria or recurrent urinary tract infection. Clinical suspicion of prostate malignancy should also prompt immediate referral.

Alpha1-blockers may be effective regardless of the size of the prostate. Full clinical response often occurs after 4-6 weeks, while finasteride may take 6 months or more to produce maximal effects. An α1-blocker may, therefore, be an appropriate first choice therapy for many men, with finasteride reserved for those who do not tolerate α1-blockade, fail to gain relief of symptoms, or whose prostates are known to be particularly enlarged. There is no convincing evidence that any α1-blocker is more effective than another.

Conclusions

Although benign prostatic hyperplasia is common in older men, many consider the symptoms to be a normal part of the ageing process, and do not seek medical treatment. Given the variation in the natural history of the condition, and the uncertainty over the risks and benefits of most of the available interventions, there is no reason to encourage men who do not find their symptoms bothersome to seek medical intervention.

For those men whose symptoms are significantly bothersome, the use of a symptom scoring system in conjunction with clinical assessment will help to categorise severity. Those suffering from severe BPH should be offered the option of surgery, most likely by TURP. Those who decline surgery, or for whom it is not an option, may be offered drug therapy. Patients should be fully informed of the potential side-effects of all therapies, and should participate in the decision about which approach is taken.

BPH: Talking With Your Doctor

No Comments


It’s important for you to know that the information we present here is not intended to substitute for a doctor’sjudgment. But we hope it will help you and your doctor arrive at a decision about which drug or drugs to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy are best for you, and which gives you the most value for your health-care dollar.

Bear in mind that many people are reluctant to discuss the cost of medicines with their doctors, and that studies show doctors do not routinely take price into account when prescribing medicines. Unless you bring it up, your doctors may assume that cost is not a factor for you.

Many people (including physicians) also believe that newer drugs are always or almost always better. While that’s a natural assumption to make, the fact is that it’s not true. Studies consistently show that many older medicines are as good as, and in some cases better than, newer medicines. Think of them as “tried and true,” particularly when it comes to their safety record. Newer drugs have not yet met the test of time, and unexpected problems can and do crop up once they hit the market.

Of course, some newer prescription drugs are indeed more effective and safer. Talk with your doctor about the pluses and minuses of newer vs. older medicines, including generic drugs.

Prescription medicines go “generic” when a company’s patents on a drug lapse, usually after about 12 to 15 years. At that point, other companies can make and sell the drug.

Generics are almost always much less expensive than newer brand-name medicines, but they are not lesser-quality drugs. Indeed, most generics remain useful medicines even many years after first being marketed. That is why today about more than 50% of all prescriptions in the U.S. are for generics.

Another important issue to talk with your doctor about is keeping a record of the drugs you are taking. There are several reasons for this:

First, if you see several doctors, each may not be aware of medicines the others have prescribed.

Second, since people differ in their response to medications, it is very common for doctors to prescribe several medicines before finding one that works well or best.

Third, many people take several prescription medications, nonprescription drugs and dietary supplements at the same time. These can interact in ways that can either reduce the benefit you get from the drug, or be dangerous.

And fourth, the names of prescription drugs — both generic and brand — are often hard to pronounce and remember.

For all these reasons, it’s important to keep a written list of all the drugs and supplements you are taking, and to periodically review this list with your doctors.

Always be sure, too, that you understand the dose of the medicine being prescribed for you and how many pills you are expected to take each day. Your doctor should tell you this information. When you fill a prescription at the pharmacy, or if you get it by mail, you should check to see that the dose and the number of pills per day on the pill bottle match the amounts that your doctor told you.

Chimpanzees May Hold the Keys to Understanding BPH

No Comments

Chimps are cute, chimps are funny. But, did you know that these intelligent primates may be the best candidate for understanding human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)?

“The greatest obstacle to BPH research is the lack of an ideal animal model,” states researchers from the University of Tennessee in Memphis and the White Sands Research Center in Alamogordo in New Mexico. They note that the chimp is unique among primates in its genetic and physiological similarity to humans.

The researchers wondered if this similarity could make the chimp a good candidate for an animal model of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). To find out whether chimps develop this disease, and if so, do they develop it the same way as humans, they studied more than 60 chimps at an animal research center. When they compared the stages of the chimps’ lives to those of humans — one chimp year is about two and one-fourth human years — they found that the chimps do develop BPH and in a way that’s remarkably similar to that of humans.

The researchers examined biopsy tissues from the chimps’ prostates and found the same kinds of cellular changes with age that are found in humans. In addition, as with humans, chimps with these tissue changes also had enlarged prostates.

Blood tests revealed that chimps, like humans, produce prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and their PSA levels get higher with age and correlate with size of the prostate, as in humans.

The researchers also did urodynamic studies, measuring urine flow, bladder pressure and capacity, and residual urine. As with humans, chimps with increasing indications of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) also had higher bladder pressures and slower urine flow, indicating that the enlarged prostate was obstructing the urinary system.

Writing in “The Journal of Urology,” the researchers concluded that “male chimpanzees develop histologic signs of BPH at the same relative point in their life cycle as humans, with increase in grade as they age.” They point out that studying this process in chimps is easier, because their diet and environment doesn’t vary as much as in humans’, and they’re not as likely to be lost to follow-up.

The researchers conclude that the chimp model for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) may provide insight into how the disease develops, and “suggest new medical therapeutic strategies against this common disease.”

Prostate Screening Test Can Predict Other Health Risks

No Comments

In the fight against prostate cancer, measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has proved to be one of medicine’s most promising screening tools. This test is currently used in the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer and as a tool for monitoring cancer recurrence following treatment. Previous studies have shown that prostate-specific antigen testing has increased the detection rate of early-stage cancers, many of which respond very favorably to therapy. Now, research is demonstrating that PSA testing may identify other prostate conditions, as well as highlight when medical intervention is required.

According to researchers from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, prostate-specific antigen test results can predict the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) and the need for prostate surgery in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Benign prostatic hyperplasia refers to a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland and is commonly found in men over age 50. Although not life-threatening, an enlarged prostate may block the urethra and make the passage of urine difficult. It can also lead to acute urinary retention, a condition in which urination becomes nearly blocked.

In this study, investigators compared the prostate-specific antigen test results of over 3,000 older men with their incidence of AUR and BPH. They found that up to 20 percent of men with high PSA levels experienced either AUR or BPH-related surgery. However, in men with low prostate-specific antigen values, fewer than eight percent experienced either of those conditions. They also noted that when patients with high PSA scores are treated with finasteride, a drug used in benign prostatic hyperplasia to shrink the prostate gland, their risk for developing acute urinary retention or requiring surgery was reduced by up to 60 percent.

The authors concluded that a patient’s prostate-specific antigen values can help doctors predict the risk of BPH-related outcomes and identify appropriate therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Drinking Some Alcohol May Lower Risk of Non-cancerous Prostate Condition

No Comments

A recent study concludes that moderate consumption of alcohol may reduce the risk of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in men.

Note: Benign prostate hyperplasia is an enlargement of the prostate; the condition is characterized by the frequent need to urinate and difficulty in urinating.

Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health analyzed data from the 30,000-male-participant Health Professionals Follow-up Study to reach their conclusions. The study found that men who consumed moderate amounts of alcohol (about two drinks per day of beer or liquor) were at lower risk of benign prostate hyperplasia. The study notes that, contrary to previous reports, cigarette smoking was not associated with a reduced risk of benign prostate hyperplasia, but rather that heavy cigarette smoking (35 or more cigarettes per day) was associated with an increased risk. Authors suggest that this benefit of alcohol consumption could be due to a resulting reduction in concentrations of testosterone in the blood.

Drug Interactions in the Treatment of ED, LUTS and BPH: Clinically Relevant Drug­-Drug Interactions

No Comments

Clinically Relevant Drug­-Drug Interactions With the 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors

Neither dutasteride nor finasteride have any clinically significant pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic adverse drug interactions. Studies show that the 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors do not affect the CYP 450 enzyme system. However, agents that inhibit the CYP 450 3A4 may, in theory, interfere with metabolism of these medications. Therefore, until more data are available, cautious monitoring should follow the concurrent administration of a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor with an agent known to alter the activity of the hepatic mixed function oxidase enzyme system.

Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions With PDE-5 Inhibitors

Pharmacodynamic drug interactions leading to precipitous hypotension and MI are clinically relevant with PDE-5 inhibitors. All selective inhibitors of cyclic GMP-specific PDE-5 are prone to clinically significant pharmacodynamic interactions with agents that produce vasodilation. The concurrent use of nitrate preparations is a contraindication to treatment with selective inhibitors of cyclic GMP-specific PDE-5. The selective inhibitors of cyclic GMP-specific PDE-5 differ with regard to the warning against concurrent use of with alpha-1-adrenergic blockers. For example, sildenafil in doses above 25 mg should not be used within four hours after ingestion of an alpha-1-adrenergic blocker. Vardenafil is contraindicated in patients treated with alpha-1-adrenergic blockers. Tadalafil is contraindicated in patients receiving an alpha-1-adrenergic blocker, with the exception of those taking tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily. Extreme caution should be employed when any PDE-5 inhibitors are used in patients receiving antihypertensive medications (e.g., nitroprusside, nitroglycerin, phentolamine, amyl nitrate, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, hydralazine, and nitrates) because the vasoactive effects of the combination may be exaggerated. Lastly, the concurrent administration of PDE-5 inhibitors and opiates (e.g., dihydrocodeine) results in exaggerated release of cyclic GMP and has been reported to produce priapism. An increased risk of cardiac events has been suspected with these agents when given concurrently with vasoactive agents that may steal blood from the cardiac collateral circulation.

Pharmacokinetic Drug­-Drug Interactions With PDE-5 Inhibitors

There are increasing numbers of patients with ED who are taking concurrent medications that can affect the metabolism of PDE-5 inhibitors. Medications that inhibit CYP3A4 (e.g., protease inhibitors, azole antifungals, erythromycin, and grapefruit juice) will significantly alter the metabolism and raise the bioavailability of PDE-5 inhibitors. These clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions require that the dose or dosage interval of the PDE-5 inhibitor be modified to prevent drug accumulation and precipitous hypotension. Table 4 lists the drugs that may produce potentially life-threatening drug­drug interactions if used concurrently with a PDE-5 inhibitor.Although medications that induce CYP3A4 may increase the metabolism of PDE-5 inhibitors, no specific dosage adjustments are required. Lastly, studies show that PDE-5 inhibitors may be given safely with theophylline, digoxin, warfarin, antacids, glyburide, tolbutamide, and ranitidine.

Table 4. Drugs that May Produce Clinically Significant Pharmacokinetic Drug­Drug Interactions With PDE-5 Inhibitors
Sildenafil plus Mechanism Effect
Cimetidine 800 mg CYP3A4 inhibition 56% increase in sildenafil’s Cp
Erythromycin 500 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition 182% increase in sildenafil’s AUC
Saquinavir 1.2 g BID CYP3A4 inhibition 210% increase in sildenafil’s AUC
Indinavir 800 mg TID CYP3A4 inhibition 340% increase in sildenafil’s AUC
Ritonavir 500 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition 1,000% increase in sildenafil’s AUC
Tadalafil plus Mechanism Effect
Ketoconazole 400 mg/d CYP3A4 inhibition 312% increase in tadalafil’s AUC
Ritonavir 200 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition 124% increase in tadalafil’s AUC
Rifampin 600 mg/d CYP3A4 induction 88% reduction in tadalafil’s AUC
Theophylline CYP1A2 substrate Pharmacokinetics were unchanged
Vardenafil plus Mechanism Effect
Cimetidine 400 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition No effect on vardenafil’s AUC
Erythromycin 500 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition Fourfold increase in vardenafil’s AUC
Ketoconazole 200 mg/d CYP3A4 inhibition Tenfold increase in vardenafil’s AUC
Indinavir 800 mg TID CYP3A4 inhibition 16-fold increase in vardenafil’s AUC
Ritonavir 600 mg BID CYP3A4 inhibition 49-fold increase in vardenafil’s AUC

Conclusions

Currently, the scientific literature is skewed in its content of useful information regarding potential drug interactions with alpha-1-adrenergic blockers and PDE-5 inhibitors. Most of the information on drug­drug interactions is with the older non­prostate-selective alpha-1-adrenergic blockers. The limited data available with tamsulosin and alfuzosin show that these agents are less likely to have pharmacodynamic interactions with alpha-1-adrenergic blockers than doxazosin or terazosin. Regarding pharmacokinetic interactions, tamsulosin has the lowest potential for clinically significant interactions because it undergoes minimal hepatic metabolism and is primarily eliminated via the kidneys. Fortunately, neither dutasteride nor finasteride have any clinically significant pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic adverse drug interactions. Because clinicians see an increasing number of patients being prescribed PDE-5 inhibitors who also have cardiovascular disease, clinicians must be vigilant about the potential for clinically significant pharmacodynamic interactions with medications that produce vasodilation or increase the release of NO. Furthermore, PDE-5 inhibitors are prime targets for clinically important drug interactions with agents that inhibit CYP3A4. Currently, there is insufficient information with which to judge the pharmacodynamic drug interaction liability of alfuzosin and of tamsulosin relative to PDE-5 inhibitors. Until such data are available, patients receiving alfuzosin or tamsulosin should be advised about the potential dangers of concomitant therapy with any of the PDE-5 inhibitors.

Drug Interactions in the Treatment of ED, LUTS and BPH: Clinically Significant Drug­-Drug Interaction

No Comments

The English-language medical literature, from 1986 to the present, was searched via the computer-based Medline system of the National Library of Medicine. The search focused on drug interaction data for the following agents: alfuzosin, doxazosin, dutasteride, finasteride, sildenafil, tamsulosin, tadalafil, terazosin, and vardenafil. Data were limited to information derived from studies of human subjects or actual patients and included premarketing and postmarketing observations. Articles reviewed included original studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. Drug interactions were grouped into either pharmacodynamic interaction or pharmacokinetic interaction based on the mechanism.

Pharmacodynamic Drug­-Drug Interactions With Selective Alpha-1-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

As a class, these agents potentiate hypotension when given concurrently with other antihypertensive agents. However, tamsulosin and alfuzosin do not cause a greater hypotensive effect when given concurrently with antihypertensive agents because tamsulosin and alfuzosin are highly selective for alpha-1-adrenergic receptors in the prostate. To evaluate the safety of a highly selective alpha-1-adrenergic blocker, Lowe studied 36 hypertensive men ages 45 years or older whose blood pressure was being controlled with maintenance doses of nifedipine (study 1), enalapril (study 2), or atenolol (study 3). All 36 subjects were treated with placebo for five days, then randomly assigned to either placebo (control group) or tamsulosin therapy (0.4 mg/day for seven days followed by 0.8 mg/day for seven days) in addition to continuing their maintenance antihypertensive therapy. Blood pressure and pulse rate were monitored over a 24-hour period on study days 4, 11, and 19. Coadministration of tamsulosin in these small studies had no clinically significant effects on the pharmacodynamic action of nifedipine, enalapril, or atenolol. It produced no clinically significant differences in pulse rate and blood pressure, did not alter electrocardiographic or Holter monitoring results, and did not cause increased side effects. Lowe concluded that a highly selective alpha-1-adrenergic blocker can be safely coadministered with the three antihypertensive agents studied and produce a favorable safety profile without having to reduce the dosage of the preexisting regimens of nifedipine, enalapril, or atenolol in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Immediate-release alfuzosin has been shown to potentiate the negative chronotropic and the vasodilatory effects of atenolol. Administration of a single dose of atenolol 100 mg with a single dose of immediate-release alfuzosin 2.5 mg in eight healthy young male subjects increased both the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and AUC values by 28% and 21%, respectively. Alfuzosin increased atenolol Cmax and AUC values by 26% and 14%, respectively. The combination of alfuzosin with atenolol caused significant reductions in mean blood pressure and in mean heart rate in this study. However, the immediate-release preparation used in this study bears no pharmacokinetic resemblance to the extended-release that is commercially available in the United States.

Studies show that hypertension in the elderly can be safely controlled with low-dose diuretic therapy. According to Maruenda and colleagues, men with benign prostatic hyperplasia may benefit from peripheral alpha-blocking drugs. However, drugs such as doxazosin or terazosin may further lower blood pressure and at times may be associated with orthostatic hypotension, especially if diuretics are given concomitantly. The newer, highly selective alpha-1-adrenergic receptor blockers (i.e., tamsulosin and alfuzosin) achieve relaxation of the smooth muscle of the prostate, as do terazosin and doxazosin, but without provoking changes in blood pressure, particularly orthostatic hypotension. There appears to be no adverse interaction with any other antihypertensive medication or with low-dose diuretics. In summary, when compared to doxazosin and terazosin, tamsulosin and alfuzosin produce fewer vascular side effects including dizziness, vertigo, and orthostasis, and tamsulosin and alfuzosin may be coadministered with agents such as calcium channel blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors without precipitating a hypotensive response. This level of enhanced tolerability with tamsulosin and alfuzosin is attributed to the specificity of these highly selective alpha-1-adrenergic blockers for prostatic alpha1A receptors.

Pharmacokinetic Drug­-Drug Interactions With Selective Alpha-1-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

Because the alpha-1-adrenergic receptor blockers, irrespective of their prostate-receptor selectivity, are metabolized by the CYP 450 system, there is the always potential for pharmacokinetic drug interaction. For example, studies show that cimetidine decreases the clearance of tamsulosin by 26% and increases AUC by 44%, and repeated administration of ketoconazole 400 mg produced a threefold increase in the AUC following a 10-mg single dose of extended-release alfuzosin. Although alfuzosin is highly selective for prostate gland alpha-1-adrenergic receptors, the safety and selectivity of this medication may be overshadowed by the exaggerated increase in its AUC as the result of decreased drug clearance by coadministration of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (e.g., amiodarone, azole antifungals, protease inhibitors, and macrolide antibiotics). Diltiazem, a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4, increased the alfuzosin AUC by 1.5-fold but did not produce any changes in blood pressure. As tamsulosin is primarily excreted via the kidney, inhibition of hepatic mixed function oxidase enzymes is less likely to produce clinically significant drug interactions. Neither tamsulosin nor alfuzosin affect the mixed function oxidase enzyme system in the liver, and these drugs may be given concurrently with warfarin or digoxin. The recommended oral dose of tamsulosin for the treatment of mild to moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia is 0.4 mg once daily. In patients who fail to respond to the 0.4-mg dose after two to four weeks of dosing, the dose may be increased to 0.8 mg once daily. Dosage escalation does not increase the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions.

Drug Interactions in the Treatment of ED, LUTS and BPH: Selective Cyclic GMP-Specific PDE-5 Inhibitors

No Comments

Pharmacodynamics

PDE-5 inhibitors are indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The physiological mechanism of penile erections involves the release of nitric oxide (NO) during sexual stimulation. Nnitric oxide activates guanylate cyclase to release copious amounts of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP). Subsequently, nitric oxide and cyclic GMP cause the smooth muscle of the corpus cavernosum to relax, and as the corpus cavernosum fills with blood, the penis becomes erect. Unfortunately, the cause of erectile dysfunction in many patients is an imbalance between contraction and relaxation of the smooth muscle of the corpus cavernosum. Competitive inhibition of PDE-5 enzymes increases the intracellular stores of cyclic guanosine monophosphate and enhances the vasodilatory effects of nitric oxide. Subsequently, cyclic GMP relaxes corpus cavernosal smooth muscle cells and increases blood flow into cavernosal spaces. These changes enhance blood flow into the corpus cavernosum and increase intracavernosal pressure to produce a firm erection during sexual stimulation.

Pharmacokinetics

PDE-5 enzyme inhibitors are rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and food has minimal effect on the absolute oral bioavailability. Fatty meals will reduce the rate of absorption of sildenafil and vardenafil. In contrast, rate and extent of absorption of tadalafil are not influenced by food. Despite the rate of absorption following a fatty meal, the wide therapeutic index and efficacy observed with these agents does not warrant caution with regard to taking either sildenafil or vardenafil with food. However, all agents have significant first-pass effect. Because PDE-5 inhibitors undergo extensive hepatic metabolism, they are prone to interactions with diseases or medications that affect hepatic function. For example, in volunteers with hepatic cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A and B), clearance of sildenafil was decreased, producing an 84% increase in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and a 47% increase in maximum serum concentration compared with age-matched volunteers with no hepatic impairment. Sildenafil is metabolized primarily via the CYP3A4 and to a minor extent by CYP2C9 hepatic microsomal isoenzymes. The N-desmethyl metabolite has 50% of the potency of the parent drug and accounts for 20% of sildenafil’s pharmacologic effects. Tadalafil undergoes hepatic metabolism and is primarily metabolized by the CYP 450 3A4 isoenzyme to inactive metabolites. However, patients with mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction do not experience a change in the AUC of tadalafil, and there are insufficient data to assess the effect of severe hepatic failure on the pharmacokinetics of tadalafil. Hepatic insufficiency significantly reduces the clearance of vardenafil. Vardenafil is primarily metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4, and to a lesser extent, CYP3A5 and CYP2C9 isozymes. The MI metabolite of vardenafil accounts for approximately 7% of the total pharmacologic activity. Moderate to severe renal insufficiency appears to increase the bioavailability of the PDE-5 inhibitors and may predispose to clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. For example, severe renal insufficiency (i.e., CrCl < 30 mL/minute) may double the AUC of sildenafil. Normal volunteers with CrCl values below 50 mL per minute saw a 20% to 30% increase in AUC following single-dose administration of vardenafil. With tadalafil, the AUC doubled in subjects with CrCls between 30 and 80 mL per minute, and the AUC increased twofold to fourfold in patients requiring hemodialysis. Table 3 lists the pharmacokinetic properties of the PDE-5 inhibitors.

Table 3. Pharmacokinetics of Type-V Cyclic GMP­PDE-5 Enzymes
Agent/

Formulation

Bioavailability

(%)

Protein Binding (%) Half-Life Active Metabolites Elimination

(%)

Sildenafil

Immediate-release tablets

40 94 3.5 h Yes Bile/feces: 80

Urine: 13

Tadalafil

Immediate-release tablets

Not known 94 17.5 h No Bile/feces: 61

Urine: 36

Vardenafil

Immediate-release tablets

15 95 14 ­ 15 h Yes Bile/feces: 93

Urine: 6

Drug Interactions in the Treatment of ED, LUTS and BPH: 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors

No Comments

Pharmacodynamics

The deficiency of 5-alpha-reductase was discovered more than 30 years ago. At this time, the role of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors was hypothesized to be beneficial for the treatment of androgen-related diseases. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is the main prostatic androgen and is approximately twice as potent as testosterone; DHT binds to androgen receptors to induce androgenic effects in the prostate gland, liver, and skin. The enzyme 5-alpha-reductase is necessary to catalyze the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. Five-alpha-reductase acts upon circulating testosterone, which when reduced to DHT accumulates in the prostate. There are two isoenzymes of 5-alpha-reductase: type 1 and type 2. The function of type 1 5-alpha-reductase is unknown. It has been found most commonly in sebaceous glands and is present in most body tissues. Type 2 5-alpha-reductase plays a role in prostate development and in the androgenic effects on the hair follicle. Finasteride inhibits mostly type 2 isoenzymes and is used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and alopecia. Approximately 85% to 90% of dihydrotestosterone is suppressed by the inhibition of type 2 isozymes. The remaining DHT is hypothesized to be from type 1 5-alpha-reductase. Dutasteride inhibits both type 1 and type 2 5-alpha-reductase and is also indicated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic properties of finasteride and dutasteride are well-defined. The agents have good oral bioavailability and undergo extensive hepatic metabolism. Both agents are extensively metabolized via hepatic CYP 450 3A4 enzymes. Bioavailability is approximately 60% and is not affected by food. The half-life of both agents increases with age; however, no dosage adjustments are necessary. Biliary/fecal elimination appears to be similar, but finasteride undergoes approximately 39% renal elimination, whereas dutasteride data suggests virtually no renal elimination. Although plasma metabolites of finasteride will be higher in patients with renal impairment, the metabolites display less than 20% of the activity of the parent drug; therefore, no dosage adjustment is necessary. The effect of hepatic impairment on either agent is unknown at this time. Table 2 compares selected pharmacokinetic properties between finasteride and dutasteride.

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic Parameters of 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors
Agent/

Formulation

Bioavailability Protein Binding Half-Life Metabolites Elimination
Finasteride

Film-coated tablets

63% ~ 90% 6 ­ 15 h Two metabolites

with < 20% activity

Biliary (57%)

Renal (39%)

Dutasteride

Soft gelatin capsules

59% > 99.5% 5 weeks 6-beta-

hydroxydutasteride (active)

Fecal (~ 45%)

Renal (~ 1%)

Drug Interactions in the Treatment of ED, LUTS and BPH: Selective Alpha-1-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers

No Comments

Pharmacodynamics

Alpha1 receptors are located in nonvascular smooth muscles (e.g., bladder trigone and sphincters, gastrointestinal tract and sphincters, prostate adenoma and capsule, and ureters) and in nonmuscular tissues (e.g., central nervous system, liver, and kidneys). Symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are related to bladder outlet obstruction, comprised of underlying static and dynamic components. The static component is associated with an increase in prostate size caused by a proliferation of smooth muscle; however, the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia and degree of urinary outlet obstruction do not correlate directly with prostate size. The dynamic component is associated with the increased smooth muscle tone in the prostate and bladder neck. Administration of the alpha1-receptor antagonist affects the dynamic component by decreasing urethral resistance, relaxing smooth muscle, and improving urine flow rates in the bladder neck and prostate. Few alpha1 receptors are in the bladder body; most are located on the prostate capsule and adenoma and the bladder trigone. Thus, blocking these receptors reduces bladder outlet obstruction without affecting bladder contractility.

At least three alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes exist: alpha1A, alpha1B, and alpha1D. Approximately 70% of the alpha1 adrenoceptors located in the prostate are of the alpha1A subtype. Both doxazosin and terazosin are nonselective alpha1 antagonists, causing a decrease in blood pressure and urinary symptoms. Alfuzosin and tamsulosin are selective for the alpha1A adrenoceptor and are less likely to cause peripheral alpha-1-adrenergic blockade and hypotension.

Pharmacokinetics

Table 1 lists the pharmacokinetic properties of the alpha-1-adrenergic receptor blockers. The bioavailability of alfuzosin is improved with food, whereas the bioavailability of tamsulosin is 30% higher when it is administered in a fasting state compared with administration in a fed state. Tamsulosin pharmacokinetic properties do not differ whether the drug is taken with a light breakfast or a high-fat breakfast. All the agents have similar protein binding and once-daily dosing because of their long half-life or extended-release formulation. Tamsulosin is primarily eliminated in the urine, whereas alfuzosin, doxazosin, and terazosin are primarily eliminated in the bile or feces. No dosing changes are needed when tamsulosin is given to patients with renal impairment. Blood alfuzosin concentrations are significantly increased in the presence of moderate to severe liver failure (i.e., Childs-Pugh categories B and C) as well as in the presence of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4; these changes may predispose to alfuzosin toxicity. Severe renal insufficiency (creatine clearance [CrCl] < 30 mL/minute) may alter the elimination of alfuzosin and raise the serum drug concentration by 50%, but there are insufficient data to determine the clinical relevance of renal insufficiency on the kinetics of alfuzosin.table 1 summarizes the pharmacokinetics of the alpha1-receptor antagonists.

Table 1. Pharmacokinetics of Alpha1-Receptor Antagonists for BPH
Agent/
Formulation
Bioavailability
(%)
Protein Binding (%) Half-Life Active Metabolites Elimination (%)
Alfuzosin

Extended-release tablets

49 (with food)

25 (fasted)

88 10 h No Bile/feces: 69

Urine: 24

Doxazosin

Immediate-release tablets

65 98 22 h Yes Bile/feces: 63

Urine: 9

Tamsulosin

Sustained-release capsules

90 (fasted)

60 (with food)

94 ­ 99 14 ­ 15 h No Bile/feces: 21

Urine: 76

Terazosin

Sustained-release tablets

90 90 ­ 94 9 ­ 12 h No Bile/feces: 60

Urine: 40