Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
The National Prescribing Centre (NPC) [UK]
Summary
Symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in older men. They result from hyperplasia of glandular tissue and increased smooth muscle tone. Many men accept these symptoms as a normal part of the ageing process, and do not seek treatment.
As BPH is not always a progressive condition, and the incidence of complications is low, ‘watchful waiting’ is appropriate for men whose symptoms are mild.
Men suffering severe symptoms, or who develop complications of benign prostatic hyperplasia such as acute urinary retention or recurrent urinary tract infection, should be referred to a urologist for consideration of surgical treatment.
Transurethral resection of the prostate is the most commonly used surgical procedure. It is more effective than drug therapy, but is occasionally associated with complications such as impotence and incontinence.
Alphaj-adrenoceptor blocking drugs reduce smooth muscle tone in the prostatic tissue and bladder neck, decreasing resistance to urinary flow. They can produce cardiovascular side-effects, such as hypotension.
Tamsulosin (Flomax MR, capsules, 400 micrograms) is an inhibitor of the α1A-receptor subtype, which is thought to be predominant in the prostate. No convincing evidence exists that this results in fewer adverse effects compared to other α1-blockers.
Finasteride (Proscar, tablets, 5mg) inhibits 5α-reductase, resulting in shrinkage of prostatic glandular tissue. There is evidence that finasteride also reduces the risk of acute urinary retention and need for surgery, although such events are relatively uncommon.
Patients should be informed of the advantages and disadvantages of all treatment options, and should participate in the choice of therapy.
What is benign prostatic hyperplasia?
BPH is a benign enlargement of the prostate gland which occurs as a consequence of ageing. This leads to narrowing of the urethra, which may result in difficulty in passing urine. Prostatic enlargement is believed to be the result of two processes:
• hyperplasia of glandular tissue, under the stimulus of dihydrotestosterone (DHT); and
• increased smooth muscle tone, both within the prostate and in the bladder neck, under the control of α1-adrenoceptors.
Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia aims to alter these processes, either by inhibiting 5α-reductase, the enzyme responsible for the formation of DHT, or by blockade of α1-adrenoceptors.
Patients suffering from BPH may present with a variety of the following symptoms, which may be classified as:
• ‘filling’ symptoms: such as frequency, urgency, and nocturia; or
• ‘voiding’ symptoms: e.g. poor urinary stream, intermittent stream, hesitancy and terminal dribbling.
Symptoms from either or both categories may occur. While they may be irritating, these symptoms do not in themselves have serious consequences. However, on some occasions, bladder outflow obstruction resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia may lead to recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and pyelonephritis, or chronic urinary retention and hydronephrosis.
How common is it?
Symptoms of BPH may be found in a large number of men over the age of 60, and the prevalence rises with age. There is a lack of consensus on an exact definition for the condition; differences in criteria for the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia have led to varying estimates of prevalence in studies.
One study determined the prevalence rates of BPH in a population of 502 men aged 55 to 74 using several different case definitions. Prevalence rates in men aged 60-64 varied from 2% to 22%, depending on the parameters used. In this study, the prostate volume used as the main cut-off for diagnosis of BPH was 30cm. However, in a study using a prostate weight of 20g as the cut-off, prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men aged 60-69 was 43%.
Added to this uncertainty is the fact that many men who admit to suffering symptoms of BPH when questioned, say their symptoms are not particularly bothersome. Many men accept symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia as a normal part of the ageing process, and may not be prompted to seek treatment.
What are the treatment options?
Treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia range from no active treatment (’watchful waiting’), through various medical interventions, to surgical treatment. Each option is associated with a different balance of risks, benefits, and level of uncertainty about the long-term outcome. Treatment of BPH is directed at improving patients’ symptoms and quality of life rather than towards prevention of the serious morbidity or mortality which may rarely result. For these reasons, it is essential that patients are actively involved in the decision on which treatment they receive.
Non-drug treatment
Benign prostatic hyperplasia is not always a progressive condition. A review article summarising the results of five studies of the natural history of BPH, concluded that, of men with moderate symptoms followed for five years, 40% would improve, 45% remain unchanged and only about 15% deteriorate. One study randomly assigned 556 men with moderate symptoms of BPH to transurethral surgery or watchful waiting and followed them for almost three years. It found that only 7% of those assigned to the watchful waiting group required surgery for ‘treatment failure’. Watchful waiting is, therefore, considered a valid treatment option for men with mild to moderate symptoms.
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered to be the gold standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. It produces significant improvements for many men in symptoms and in objective measures, such as peak urinary flow rate. Complications which have been attributed to TURP include retrograde ejaculation, impotence, and some degree of urinary incontinence. However, the study mentioned above found no difference in rates of incontinence or impotence between men assigned to transurethral resection of the prostate and those assigned to watchful waiting.
Drug treatment
Alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking drugs act by reducing smooth muscle tone in the prostatic tissue and bladder neck, thereby decreasing resistance to urinary flow. Six agents are available in the UK; these are alfuzosin (Xatral, tablets, 2.5mg; Xatral SR, tablets, 5mg), doxazosin (Cardura, tablets, 2mg/4mg), indoramin (Doralese, tablets, 20mg), prazosin (Hypovase, tablets, 2mg; Prazosin, tablets, 2mg), tamsulosin (Flomax MR, capsules) and terazosin (Hytrin BPH, tablets, 5mg/10mg).
A review of twenty-nine clinical trials of α1-blockers stated that the average improvement in maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) with these compounds was 1.5ml/s. Overall symptom scores decreased by 14% and residual urine volume decreased by 29%. Some tolerance to the effects on urinary flow rate was noted in a proportion of patients after six months of therapy. However, the improvement in symptom scores was maintained long-term.
Side-effects associated with the α1-blockers include hypotension, particularly after the first dose, sedation, and dizziness. Therapy is usually begun with a low dose taken at bedtime and titrated upwards over a few weeks.
Tamsulosin is an agent which is more selective than other alpha1-blockers; it is said to act on the α1A-receptor subtype, which is thought to be predominant in prostatic tissue. Theoretically, such a selective action might avoid some of the cardiovascular effects seen with other agents.
Tamsulosin has been compared to alfuzosin and terazosin in clinical trials. When compared to alfuzosin in 245 men with benign prostatic enlargement and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia, tamsulosin produced comparable improvements in O and symptom scores over twelve weeks. Although tamsulosin had significantly less effect on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure than alfuzosin, no difference in the rate of adverse events associated with the hypotensive effects of α1-blockers was observed.
In the second study, which was single-blind, involved 72 patients and lasted for nine weeks, tamsulosin and terazosin were similarly effective in improving both subjective and objective measures of BPH. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular effects was higher in the terazosin group. It is difficult to assess how relevant the results of this study are to the UK, as it was conducted in Korea and the dose of tamsulosin was much lower than that used here.
Finasteride is a specific inhibitor of the enzyme 5a-reductase, which is responsible for the metabolism of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, a more potent androgen. DHT stimulates prostatic growth and the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Treatment with 5mg finasteride for twelve months has been shown to reduce prostate volume by 19%, increase maximum urinary flow rate by 1.6ml/s, and decrease total urinary-symptom scores by 21%.
Two recent studies investigated the effects of finasteride on the incidence of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment. The first study was a pooled analysis of three randomised, double-blind, multicentre studies comparing finasteride 5mg daily to placebo over 24 months in 4,222 patients with moderate symptoms of BPH. Finasteride therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in both acute urinary retention and rates of surgical intervention.
The second study compared 5mg of finasteride to placebo over four years in a randomised, double-blind trial. A total of 3,040 men with enlarged prostates and moderate to severe urinary symptoms were recruited from 95 centres. The primary end-point of the study was the symptom score; need for prostate surgery and development of acute urinary retention were secondary end-points.
Symptom scores decreased by a mean of 3.3 points out of 35 (9.4%) in the finasteride group, compared to a mean of 1.3 points (3.7%) in the placebo group. The risks of surgery and acute urinary retention (AUR) were both significantly reduced by finasteride. However, the absolute reduction in the risk of surgery or AUR was only 6.6%, meaning that 15 men would have to be treated with finasteride for four years in order to avoid one episode of acute urinary retention or surgery.
A recent meta-analysis of six trials comparing finasteride with placebo examined whether there was any relationship between measures of disease severity at the start of treatment and the response to finasteride. It concluded that improvements in peak urinary flow rate and symptom scores were significant only in men whose prostate volume was measured (by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging) at greater than 40cm3.
Adverse effects associated with finasteride include decreased libido, decreased ejaculate volume and impotence. Finasteride reduces serum concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA), a marker for prostate cancer, by an average of 50%.
Finasteride was compared to terazosin, combination therapy, and placebo in 1,229 men in a double-blind study lasting 52 weeks. This study found that terazosin was significantly more effective than finasteride and placebo in improving symptom scores and urinary flow rate. It also found that the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin monotherapy, even though finasteride reduced prostate size. Finasteride alone was not significantly different to placebo.
This study has been criticised on the basis of its inclusion criteria, which were based on symptoms rather than prostate size. The average prostate volume in the study population was only 37cm. An accompanying editorial suggested that men with larger prostates might respond differently to finasteride.
How should patients be managed?
The following investigations are recommended before any course of action is decided:
• full medical history,
• urinary symptom review,
• digital rectal examination (DRE),
• urine analysis, and
• serum creatinine.
Routine measurement of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is controversial. This is due to uncertainty over whether moderately raised levels are indicative of benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer. GPs should discuss policies on the use of PSA levels with local urology departments.
Symptom severity is not directly related to prostate size. Use of a validated symptom score, such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), can help to categorise the severity of BPH, and monitor response to therapy.
Referral to a urologist for further investigations (such as ultrasound and urinary flow rate studies) and management may be considered for patients with moderate to severe symptoms, as well as those with complications such as haematuria or recurrent urinary tract infection. Clinical suspicion of prostate malignancy should also prompt immediate referral.
Alpha1-blockers may be effective regardless of the size of the prostate. Full clinical response often occurs after 4-6 weeks, while finasteride may take 6 months or more to produce maximal effects. An α1-blocker may, therefore, be an appropriate first choice therapy for many men, with finasteride reserved for those who do not tolerate α1-blockade, fail to gain relief of symptoms, or whose prostates are known to be particularly enlarged. There is no convincing evidence that any α1-blocker is more effective than another.
Conclusions
Although benign prostatic hyperplasia is common in older men, many consider the symptoms to be a normal part of the ageing process, and do not seek medical treatment. Given the variation in the natural history of the condition, and the uncertainty over the risks and benefits of most of the available interventions, there is no reason to encourage men who do not find their symptoms bothersome to seek medical intervention.
For those men whose symptoms are significantly bothersome, the use of a symptom scoring system in conjunction with clinical assessment will help to categorise severity. Those suffering from severe BPH should be offered the option of surgery, most likely by TURP. Those who decline surgery, or for whom it is not an option, may be offered drug therapy. Patients should be fully informed of the potential side-effects of all therapies, and should participate in the decision about which approach is taken.
