Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia – Prostate Cancer – Prostatitis

Posts Tagged ‘Prostate Cancer’

Prostate Cancer: The Pharmacist’s Role

No Comments

Pharmacists have an important role in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. Monitoring patients for adverse effects of drug therapy, drug/disease interactions, adherence (particularly with hormone therapy), preventing complications from chemotherapy, and guiding palliative care are common areas that pharmacists can address in the care of patients with prostate cancer. Chemotherapy orders need to be reviewed not only for correct dose but also to ensure that toxicities are prevented. For example, dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and H2 antagonists need to be ordered as premedication for paclitaxel to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Prospective evaluation to prevent chemotherapy toxicity is important when selecting a chemotherapy regimen for patients with prostate cancer. For instance, estramustine, which can cause vascular complications, should be avoided in patients who have a history of thromboembolism or significant cardiovascular disease. Taxanes and vinca alkaloids should be used with caution in patients with hepatic insufficiency. These are but a few examples of complications that can be prevented.

Global care that provides individual support while focusing on the overall well-being of patients should be implemented. Table 5 provides information for pharmacists to counsel patients regarding side effects of treatments. Prostate cancer patients require pharmacist focus in the areas of pain, anti-infective therapy, depression, and anxiety, both to monitor ongoing therapy and to initiate therapy for new indications. These types of interventions help pharmacists provide patients with the most effective therapy while minimizing adverse events.

Table 5. Counseling on Side Effects of Treatments for Prostate Cancer
Treatment Comments
Watchful waiting While waiting avoids the side effects of surgery and radiation, it may reduce the chance of controlling the disease before it spreads. Also, older men should keep in mind that it may be harder to tolerate surgery and radiation therapy as they age. A man who chooses watchful waiting but later becomes concerned or anxious should discuss his feelings with a health care professional.
Surgery Postsurgical pain can be controlled with medication. Following surgery, the patient will wear a catheter to drain urine for 10 days to three weeks. The nurse or doctor will show the man how to care for the catheter. It is also common for patients to feel extremely tired or weak for a while. The length of time it takes to recover from an operation varies. Surgery to remove the prostate may cause long-term problems, including rectal injury and urinary incontinence. Some men may have temporary or permanent erectile dysfunction. Men who have a prostatectomy no longer produce semen, so they have dry orgasms. Men who wish to father children may consider sperm banking or a sperm retrieval procedure.
Radiation therapy Radiation therapy may cause patients to become extremely tired, especially in the later weeks of treatment. Resting is important, but physicians usually encourage men to try to stay as active as they can. Some men may have diarrhea or frequent and uncomfortable urination. When men with prostate cancer receive external radiation therapy, it is common for the skin in the treated area to become red, dry, and tender. External radiation therapy can also cause hair loss in the treated area. The loss may be temporary or permanent, depending on the dose of radiation. Both types of radiation therapy may cause impotence in some men, but internal radiation therapy is not as likely as external radiation therapy to damage the nerves that control erection. However, internal radiation therapy may cause temporary incontinence. Long-term side effects from internal radiation therapy are uncommon.
Hormonal therapy The side effects of hormonal therapy depend largely on the type of treatment. Orchiectomy and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists often cause side effects such as impotence, hot flashes, and loss of sexual desire. When first taken, an LH-RH agonist may make a patient’s symptoms worse for a short time. This temporary problem is called “tumor flare.” Gradually, however, the treatment causes a man’s testosterone level to fall. Without testosterone, tumor growth slows down and the patient’s condition improves. (To prevent tumor flare, the doctor may give the man an antiandrogen for a while along with the LH-RH agonist.) Antiandrogens can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or breast growth or tenderness. If used a long time, ketoconazole may cause liver problems, and aminoglutethimide can cause skin rashes. Men who receive total androgen blockade may experience more side effects than men who receive a single method of hormonal therapy. Any method of hormonal therapy that lowers androgen levels can contribute to weakening of the bones in older men.
Follow-up care During and after treatment, the physician will continue to follow the patient. The doctor will examine the man regularly to be sure that the disease has not returned or progressed, and will decide what other medical care may be needed. Follow-up exams may include x-rays, scans, and lab tests, such as the PSA blood test.
Support Living with a serious disease such as cancer is not easy. Some people find they need help coping with the emotional as well as the practical aspects of their disease. Patients often get together in support groups, where they can share what they have learned about coping with their disease and the effects of treatment. Patients may want to talk with a member of their health care team about finding a support group.

Prostate Cancer: Options in Moderate- and Late-Stage Cancer

No Comments

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and interstitial implantation (brachytherapy) are the two types of radiation therapy (RT) currently available for treatment of prostate cancer. The course for external beam radiation therapy is four to six weeks and is administered daily. A linear accelerator is used to direct gamma rays to the prostate with efforts made to avoid radiating healthy tissue. Problems associated with EBRT are impotence, diarrhea, bowel urgency, hemorrhoids, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, and pain. According to the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study, men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were more likely to be incontinent and impotent than men who underwent EBRT; however, men who received external beam radiation therapy had an increased incidence of bowel dysfunction. Brachytherapy involves implanting radioactive seeds into the prostate which will emit radiation over a given period of time. Brachytherapy is convenient because it requires one outpatient visit for implantation compared to external beam radiation therapy, which is administered daily. The procedure can cause prostate inflammation, which may lead to severe urinary retention. Long-term effects from brachytherapy include painful urination, urinary retention, bowel dysfunction, and rectal ulcers.

Hormone Therapy: Hormone therapy has a variety of roles in the treatment of prostate cancer. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) was one of the first hormonal treatments for prostate cancer. DES inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) from the hypothalamus, thus inhibiting testosterone release from the testes. Diethylstilbestrol had a number of undesirable toxicities associated with it, such as increased risk of cardiovascular death, thromboembolism, and significant gynecomastia. Diethylstilbestrol is no longer first-line hormone therapy since luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists have been introduced and have a better side effect profile. DES, which is no longer manufactured commercially, may be used as a second-line agent and may be obtained from a specialty compounding pharmacy. The LH-RH agonists available are goserelin, leuprolide, and triptorelin; all are as effective as a bilateral orchiectomy in reducing testosterone levels. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists inhibit the release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) through negative feedback by down-regulating the receptors on the pituitary. Testosterone levels are then decreased because there is a lack of LH to stimulate the testes to produce testosterone. Initially LH-RH agonists cause FSH and LH to surge with a concomitant surge in testosterone levels until receptor down-regulation occurs. This increase in testosterone can cause a “flare” of the disease, leading to an increased growth in the tumor, urinary symptoms, and bone pain, which usually lasts about two weeks. Other common adverse effects from luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists include erectile dysfunction, hot flashes, and decreased libido. Giving the patient a short course of nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy, which will block the androgen receptor at the cellular level, inhibiting the effects of testosterone, can prevent or minimize this effect. Antiandrogens (bicalutamide, flutamide, and nilutamide) competitively inhibit testosterone and dihydrotestosterone from binding to the androgen receptor. Adverse effects from antiandrogens are gynecomastia, hot flashes, diarrhea, constipation, and elevated liver function tests. Because antiandrogens do not provide as much androgen deprivation when compared to orchiectomy, it is not recommended that they be used as monotherapy in advanced or high-risk prostate cancer. For patients with low- and intermediate-risk early prostate cancer, there is a developing trend to treat with antiandrogens as monotherapy, especially in younger males who may want to decrease the incidence of impotence. In one study, the response rate of monotherapy with high-dose bicalutamide (>= 150 mg) in 31 patients with hormone-refractory disease was 22.5% overall and 43% in patients who were previously treated with flutamide. Combination therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists and antiandrogens, otherwise known as combined androgen blockade (CAB), is mainly reserved for patients who have advanced disease and need to prevent the effects of the testosterone surge secondary to the LH-RH agonist by being on an antiandrogen for a period of two to four weeks. Because of the inconsistent data regarding the ability of CAB to significantly increase disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life, CAB is not recommended as standard therapy and should not be used as long-term maintenance therapy. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy is hormone therapy given before RP or RT to reduce the tumor size. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group has studied the use of hormone therapy prior to prostatectomy. Patients were to receive either leuprolide plus flutamide (ie, CAB) three months before RP or RP alone. There were significantly fewer positive tumor margins in patients who received hormone therapy, but biochemical recurrence (abnormal prostate-specific antigen value) rate was the same at five years as in those who received RP alone. There have been several other prospective trials that have failed to show improvement in survival or biochemical recurrence despite improved surgical outcomes. In patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, hormone therapy plus RT has been shown to improve survival, disease-free survival, and disease progression, but it did not have the same outcomes for men with prostate-confined disease.

Chemotherapy: Eventually almost all patients will develop hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC); median survival in these patients is less than one year. The use of chemotherapy in HRPC historically has been limited to palliative care. The combination of mitoxantrone plus prednisone has been shown to improve pain in hormone-resistant prostate cancer and is a suitable choice for palliative treatment. Tannock et al randomized patients to either prednisone 10 mg daily plus mitoxantrone 12 mg/m every 21 days or to prednisone 10 mg daily. Pain was improved significantly, and the response duration was longer in the mitoxantrone group (29% vs 12% and 43 vs 18 weeks, respectively). The combination of estramustine and a taxane has shown the most promise with higher rates of biochemical and objective response in addition to a palliative response. Phase I studies with estramustine and a taxane failed to show any effect on survival. However, some phase II trials with estramustine and docetaxel revealed an increase in median survival time, implying there may be a positive effect on survival with this regimen. There is currently an ongoing study comparing estramustine and docetaxel with mitoxantrone and prednisone with the primary end point being survival. There are also studies comparing three-drug regimens of chemotherapy (eg, estramustine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel), which are considered experimental at this time.

Prostate Cancer: Options in Therapy for Early-Stage Cancer

No Comments

The current treatments for organ-confined prostate cancer are watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy (RP), and radiation therapy (RT).

Watchful Waiting: When patients opt to go without treatment and wait until there is observed disease progression, this is termed watchful waiting. For the first year, patients who choose watchful waiting will have a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and a DRE every three months, then less frequently if there is no evidence of disease progression.

Radical Prostatectomy and Radiation Therapy: There is a need for randomized controlled trials to determine which of the standard treatments are most appropriate in early prostate cancer, since there has not been convincing data as to whether radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy is the better treatment in the early stage. Currently, the patient’s Gleason score and life expectancy determine the method of treatment. For example, a man with a low Gleason score who is expected to live for more than 20 years should be considered for a radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, whereas a man with a high Gleason score who is not expected to live 10 years should be considered for no treatment until he is symptomatic or for radiation therapy immediately, depending on the aggressiveness and stage of the disease. For long-term survival, radical prostatectomy is thought to provide the best outcomes. Common complications from radical prostatectomy include urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction.

Prostate Cancer: Prevention

No Comments

At this time, there is not an approved chemoprevention agent for prostate cancer, though this is an active area of study. Finasteride is a 5a-reductase inhibitor approved for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and male pattern baldness. Prostate cancer has never been reported in men who have a deficiency in the enzyme 5a-reductase. In trials, finasteride has been shown to prevent prostate growth and may decrease prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention Trial (PCPT) is testing finasteride as a chemoprotective agent. PCPT has enrolled more than 18,000 men and assigned them to either finasteride 5 mg per day or placebo. The primary end point of this study is the number of biopsy-proven prostate cancers in finasteride patients versus in placebo patients, and the results are expected in 2004. Saw palmetto is an herbal therapy used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms and is thought to be a 5a-reductase inhibitor. Currently there are no published in vivo or outcomes studies regarding saw palmetto as a chemopreventative. One in vitro study showed that saw palmetto berry extract inhibited growth in some human prostatic cell lines. A recent study suggests that selenium may decrease the incidence of prostate cancer. The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer trial randomly assigned 927 men to selenium 200 mcg per day or placebo. Twenty-two men in the selenium group developed prostate cancer compared to 42 men in the placebo group. Favorable response was found in men with low baseline selenium levels (123.2 ng/mL) and a low baseline PSA (< 4 ng/mL). Although this is significant, there are limitations to these results, and further study is required with selenium in prostate cancer. The SELECT (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial) is now in progress and is expected to have more reliable data regarding selenium in prostate cancer prevention.

Prostate Cancer: Clinical Presentation

No Comments

Due to current recommendations for screening, most patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Prostate cancer is often a slowly progressing disease. In fact, many cases are not diagnosed, and death is from causes unrelated to prostate cancer. Patients with locally advanced disease may present with nonspecific symptoms similar to those of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) such as urinary retention, increased urinary frequency, interrupted urine flow, hesitancy, burning or painful urination, dribbling, erectile dysfunction, and painful ejaculation (Table 3). In advanced metastatic disease, patients will often have pain in their lower back and pelvis due to bone metastasis. Prostate cancer can metastasize to the lymph nodes, bone, and visceral organs. The most common site of lymph node involvement is the abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes. Bone metastases are frequently osteoblastic lesions in the lumbar spine. Metastases to the visceral organs include the lung, liver, and adrenal glands. Prostate cancer is graded by how differentiated it is from normal tissue using the Gleason score. The Gleason system is based exclusively on the architectural pattern of the glands of the prostate tumor. It evaluates how effectively the cells of any particular cancer are able to structure themselves into glands resembling those of the normal prostate. The ability of a tumor to mimic normal gland architecture is called its differentiation, and experience has shown that a tumor whose structure is nearly normal (well differentiated) will probably have a biological behavior relatively close to normal – that is, not aggressively malignant.

Table 3. Signs and Symptoms of Prostate Cancer
• Weak or interrupted urinary stream
• Frequent and/or urgent urination, especially at night
• Difficulty starting or stopping the urinary stream
• Incomplete emptying of the bladder
• Painful, burning urination
• Blood in the urine or semen
• Difficulty in having an erection
• Painful ejaculation
• Pain or stiffness in the lower back, hips, or upper thighs

The principle is fairly simple, and Gleason grading from very well differentiated (grade 1) to very poorly differentiated (grade 5) is usually done for the most part by viewing the low magnification microscopic image of the cancer. There are important additional details that require higher magnification, and an ability to accurately grade any tumor is achieved only through much training and experience in pathology.

Prostate cancer is shown blocking the urethra, which causes many of the urinary symptoms.

Gleason Grades 1 and 2: These two grades closely resemble normal prostate. They are the least important grades because they seldom occur in the general population and because they confer a prognostic benefit which is only slightly better than grade 3. Both of these grades are composed by very pale glands that grow closely together. In grade 1 they form a compact mass; in grade 2 they are more loosely aggregated, and some glands invade into the surrounding muscle of the gland.

Gleason Grade 3: This is the most common grade by far and is considered moderately well differentiated (slightly more differentiated than grades 1 and 2). This is because all three grades have a normal “gland unit” like that of a normal prostate; that is, every cell is part of a circular row, which forms the lining of a central space (the lumen). The lumen contains prostatic secretion like normal prostate, and each gland unit is surrounded by prostate muscle which keeps the gland units apart. In contrast to grade 2, wandering of glands (invading) into the stroma (muscle) is prominent and is the main defining feature.

Gleason Grade 4: This is probably the most important grade because it is fairly common and because if a lot of it is present, patient prognosis is usually (but not always) worsened by a considerable degree. Here also there is a big jump in loss of architecture. There is disruption and loss of the normal gland unit. In fact, grade 4 is identified almost entirely by loss of the ability to form individual, separate gland units, each with its separate lumen (secretory space). This important distinction is simple in concept but complex in practice because there are a variety of differently appearing ways in which the cancer‘s effort to form gland units can be distorted. Each cancer has its own partial set of tools with which it builds part of the normal structure. Grade 4 is like the branches of a large tree, reaching in many directions from the (well-differentiated) trunk of grades 1, 2, and 3. Much experience is required for this diagnosis, and not all patterns are easily distinguished from grade 3. This is the main class of poorly differentiated prostate cancer, and its distinction from grade 3 is the most important grading decision.

Gleason Grade 5: In the process of differentiation this is a significant step towards poor prognosis. Its overall importance for the general population is reduced by the fact that it is less common than grade 4, and it is seldom seen in men whose prostate cancer is diagnosed early in its development. This grade too shows a variety of patterns, all of which demonstrate no evidence of any attempt to form gland units. This grade is often called undifferentiated, because its features are not significantly distinguishing to make it look any different from undifferentiated cancers that occur in other organs.

Gleason score is a grading mechanism based on how the tumor looks at a histologic level and gives information on how aggressive the tumor is. Gleason’s system assigns histologic grade to predominant (primary) and lesser (secondary) pattern of tumor. The grade numbers of the two patterns are added to obtain the Gleason score, which may range from 2 to 10. A Gleason score of 2 to 4 is well differentiated, 5 to 6 is moderately differentiated, and 7 to 10 is poorly differentiated.

The American Urologic System (AUS) is widely used in the United States to stage prostate tumors. The AUS, which includes the Gleason score, gives the overall stage for the patient’s cancer. Gleason score, tumor size, and local extent of the tumor are the prognostic factors for prostate cancer (Table 4). Tumor confined to the prostate is an important aspect to survival. Because differentiation is a factor in determining the stage of prostate cancer, the Gleason score is crucial for an accurate prognosis. Ten-year survival rate is 75% in men with cancer confined to the prostate, while men who have regional extension or metastases have a 55% and 15% 10-year survival rate, respectively.

Table 4. Treatment of Prostate Cancer Based on Prognostic Factors
AUS Stage Tumor Size and Extent Gleason Score Current Treatment
A Nonpalpable, cannot be clinically assessed 2 ­ – 4 Watchful waiting, RP, or RT
B Tumor may or may not be clinically assessable and is confined to the prostate 4 ­ – 5 Watchful waiting, RP, or RT with or without hormone therapy
C Tumor localized around the prostate area may or may not extend into adjacent structures 6 ­ – 7 RP or RT, and/or hormone therapy* or chemotherapy
D Metastasis 8 ­ – 10 Hormone therapy* and/or chemotherapy
AUS: American Urological System; RP: radical prostatectomy; RT: radiation therapy
*If first-line hormone therapy has failed, secondary hormone therapy can be implemented.

Prostate Cancer: Screening

No Comments

Controversy surrounds screening for prostate cancer with the main arguments being questionable cost-effectiveness and overdiagnosis when the disease can be indolent and may be at a point where it is medically irrelevant to intervene. Screening for prostate cancer is done by digital rectal exam (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). DRE and PSA should be done annually in men starting at age 50, and at age 45 for those who are at high risk (eg, African-American men, and men with a family history of prostate cancer). There are limitations to PSA and DRE. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not specific to men with prostate cancer, as it is also elevated in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Another disadvantage of PSA is that it cannot predict the stage, aggressiveness, or metastasis of cancer. Although DRE is more specific than PSA for prostate cancer, it is subject to human observation, and the disease is often not localized when diagnosed.

Table 2. Normal PSA Levels According to Age and Rac

Age

African-American PSA level (ng/mL)

White PSA level (ng/mL)

40 ­ – 49

0 ­ – 2.0

0 ­ – 2.5

50 ­ – 59

0 ­ – 4.0

0 – 3.5

60 – 69

0 ­ – 4.5

0 – ­ 4.5

70 ­ – 79

0 ­ – 5.5

0 ­ – 6.5

Normal PSA range is based on age and race (Table 2). PSA velocity is a measurement of how much the PSA level is rising over time. When PSA levels increase by more than 0.75 ng/mL per year it may be indicative of prostate cancer. If either PSA or DRE is positive, then further evaluation needs to be done by imaging procedures, such as transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and biopsy.

  • TRUS uses sound-wave echoes to create an image of the prostate gland to visually inspect for abnormal conditions such as gland enlargement, nodules, penetration of tumor through capsule of the gland, and/or invasion of seminal vesicles; it may also be used for guidance of needle biopsies of the prostate gland and/or guiding the nitrogen probes in cryosurgery.
  • Computed tomography scan (also called CT or CAT scan) is a diagnostic imaging procedure that uses a combination of x-rays and computer technology to produce cross-sectional images (often called slices), both horizontally and vertically, of the body. A CT scan shows detailed images of any part of the body, including the bones, muscles, fat, and organs. CT scans are more detailed than x-rays.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a diagnostic procedure that uses a combination of large magnets, radio frequencies, and a computer to produce detailed images of organs and structures within the body.
  • Radionuclide bone scan is a nuclear imaging method that helps to show whether the cancer has spread from the prostate gland to the bones. The procedure involves an injection of radioactive material that helps to locate diseased bone cells throughout the entire body, suggesting possible metastatic cancer.
  • A (lymph node and/or prostate) biopsy is a procedure in which tissue samples are removed (with a needle or during surgery) from the body for examination under a microscope to determine if cancer or other abnormal cells are present. The diagnosis of cancer is confirmed only by a biopsy.

Prostate Cancer: Risk Factors

No Comments

There are a variety of risk factors associated with prostate cancer (Table 1). Age, race, and genetics are the most likely risk indicators. Although rare before the age of 45, the incidence of prostate cancer escalates rapidly with each subsequent decade. Prostate cancer is more common in African-American men, who tend to have worse prognostic factors at diagnosis. Familial history of prostate cancer greatly increases the likelihood of developing the disease.

Added risk factors that may be associated with prostate cancer include consuming a high-fat/low-vegetable diet, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), occupational exposure to cadmium, and higher testosterone level (eg, African-American men have 15% more testosterone compared to white men).

Table 1. Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer
Age: Being over age 50. In the United States, prostate cancer is found mainly in men over 55. The average age at diagnosis is 70.
Family history of prostate cancer: A man’s risk doubles if his father had the disease, and the risk triples if a brother had it; hereditary prostate cancer typically begins among a cluster of relatives before age 55.
Race: The disease is nearly twice as common in African-American men as in white American men. It is less common in Asian and American Indian men. Japanese and Chinese men native to their country have the lowest rates of prostate cancer. When Chinese and Japanese men immigrate to the US, their risk and mortality rate from prostate cancer increase, when compared to their native populations. In Japan, the incidence of prostate cancer has increased as Western diets and lifestyles have been adopted.
Diet and dietary supplements: Consuming a high-fat diet, particularly one high in saturated fats typical of the diet in Western industrialized countries, raises one’s risk. Specifically, certain aspects of the diet affect the risk for prostate cancer.

Fat: Studies suggest that men who eat a high-fat diet have a greater chance of developing prostate cancer.

Fiber: Dietary fiber intake may influence circulating levels of testosterone and estradiol, which, in turn, may decrease the progression of prostate cancer.

Soy protein: Besides lower fat intake, another major difference between Asian and American diets is the consumption of soy; Asians average ingesting 35 g/day. Soy contains isoflavones, which, in several studies, have been found to inhibit the growth of prostate cancer.

Vitamin E and selenium: Vitamin E, an antioxidant, combined with selenium, has been shown to inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animals.

Carotenoids: Carotenoids containing lycopenes have been shown to inhibit the growth of human prostate cancer cells in tissue cultures (cells grown in the laboratory). The primary source of lycopenes is processed tomatoes in tomato juice and tomato paste.

Herbal preparations: Combination herbal preparations should be used with caution, as reported side effects have included venous thrombosis, breast tenderness, and loss of libido. Many herbal preparations have not been studied in men with prostate cancer.

Obesity: Obesity not only contributes to diabetes and high cholesterol but also has been associated with some common cancers, including hormone-dependent tumors such as prostate, breast, and ovarian cancer.
Environmental/occupational exposure: Some studies show an increased risk for prostate cancer in men who are farmers or who have been exposed to the metal cadmium while making batteries, welding, or electroplating. Additional research is needed in this area to confirm whether this is a true association.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Research data are conflicting: some studies suggest a link while others do not.

Prostate Cancer: Introduction

No Comments

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Pharmacists not only monitor drug side effects, interactions, and adherence but also prevent complications of chemotherapy and guide palliative care.

Pharmacists have an important role in the treatment of patients who have prostate cancer. Monitoring patients for adverse effects of drug therapy, drug/disease interactions, adherence (particularly with hormone therapy), preventing complications from chemotherapy, and guiding palliative care are common areas that pharmacists address in the care of patients with prostate cancer. Prostate cancer patients require special focus on the areas of pain, anti-infective therapy, depression, and anxiety. Through these types of interventions pharmacists can ensure that their patients receive the most effective therapy with the least complications.

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States and Canada (after skin cancer) and accounts for 33% of all new cancer cases diagnosed. It is also the second leading cause of cancer death in men and is predicted to result in 10% of all cancer deaths in the year 2003. It is estimated that this year 220,900 new cases of prostate cancer will occur in the US, with 28,900 deaths. Although a significant increase in the incidence of prostate cancer during the late 1980s and early 1990s has been attributed to accessibility of screening tests for prostate specific antigen (PSA), the incidence was rising prior to that time. Currently, the incidence of prostate cancer is on a downward trend. The prevalence of prostate cancer is highest in the United States and Scandinavian countries. Asian countries have the lowest incidence of prostate cancer, while the highest incidence and mortality rates are in African-American men.

Prostate Brachytherapy Becoming More Popular

No Comments

An old technique for treating prostate cancer is enjoying new popularity, thanks to advances in computer technology, says Dr. William J. Ellis of the University of Washington. Brachytherapy, in which radioactive “seeds” are injected into the prostate, is a viable alternative to surgery or traditional radiation therapy for some men with this cancer.

Dr. Ellis and Dr. John C. Blasko of the Seattle Prostate Institute led a course for fellow urologists at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in Atlanta last week. They described the techniques used in brachytherapy and the criteria for selecting patients.

Usually, a urologist and a radiation oncologist work together to deliver this treatment, the doctors explained. The first step is a volume study in which ultrasound imaging through the rectum is used to measure the size of the prostate so the appropriate dose of radiation can be determined. With the patient carefully positioned, the ultrasound probe sends data to a computer program that digitizes the two-dimensional images and creates a three-dimensional reconstruction of the prostate gland.

After appropriate treatment has been determined, the implant itself takes place. The patient is positioned in exactly the same way as during the volume study, and receives an intravenous antibiotic while under either general or regional anesthetic. Needles containing the radioactive seeds are carefully positioned according to the coordinates determined by the software program. Usually, 25 to 35 needles, each containing two to six seeds, are used. Several imaging systems are used to make sure the seeds are implanted correctly.

Two factors taken into consideration when considering brachytherapy are the extent of the cancer — whether it has spread beyond the prostate — and its rate of growth. If cancer has spread outside the prostate, Dr. Ellis and Dr. Blasko explained, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be used before the brachytherapy. EBRT covers the prostate, the seminal vesicles and the regional lymph nodes.

Another factor to consider before deciding on treatment is the size of the prostate gland. If it is too big, accurate needle insertion is more difficult and the increased number of seeds needed to treat it, may damage the urethra. Dr. Ellis and Dr. Blasko stated that hormone therapy can be used three or four months before brachytherapy to reduce the size of the prostate.

Like any treatment, brachytherapy can present risks and side effects. Complications can include urinary retention, inflammation and/or narrowing of the urethra, incontinence and proctitis (inflammation of the anus and rectum). The most serious of these is urinary retention — medications are often used before and after the brachytherapy to reduce the size of the prostate and improve urination.

Dr. Ellis and Dr. Blasko pointed out that although brachytherapy may cause more urinary irritation than surgery, it’s less likely to cause incontinence and impotence — two reasons it is becoming more popular in treating prostate cancer. Another reason is that the treatment can be done on an outpatient basis.

Surprising Findings about PSA and Prostate Cancer

No Comments

It is well accepted by urologists that the higher a man’s blood level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) prior to treatment for prostate cancer, the worse the prognosis for cure. But new data presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in Atlanta early this month challenges this common wisdom.

“Serum PSA drawn preoperatively does not reflect a change in cure rate until the level reaches nine ng/ml. The cure rates by radical prostatectomy are all the same between two and nine ng/ml,” stated Dr. Thomas A. Stanley of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. He presented his data and conclusions to fellow urologists in a special lecture at the meetings.

Dr. Stanley looked at long-term data from 695 men with prostate cancer. As expected, among men with preoperative prostate specific antigen levels above 10 ng/ml, higher PSA levels predicted lower cure rates. But he looked specifically at those men whose PSA levels were between two and nine ng/ml. His surprising findings: the cure rate was about 80 percent across the whole range.

“PSA is a very good marker above nine ng/ml,” stated Dr. Stanley. “But something else is driving prostate specific antigen other than the cancer between two and nine”. And that something else, he reasons, is benign prostate enlargement.

“I believe our diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen between two and nine ng/ml is pure serendipity, unrelated to morphologic variables of the cancer or to its cure rate,” says Dr. Stanley. It is well known that benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a non-cancerous condition, also elevates prostate specific antigen. The researcher noted that among men with prostate cancer, PSA levels did not reflect either cancer stage or size of the tumor.

“The bottom line is that we urgently need a far better marker for prostate cancer than prostate specific antigen,” Dr. Stanley concluded.

If the findings are supported by more research, the clinical approach to treating men with prostate cancer could change: men with lower prostate specific antigen levels might be told to delay surgery “because the chance of cure should be about 80 percent until prostate specific antigen crosses the nine ng/ml threshold,” he stated.